| 
Departments
|
Local 1990 Contract Negotiations
Update
By Region 8 Servicing Representative Mike Brown
UAW Local 1990 represents bargaining unit
employees of the NTN-Bower Corporation located in Hamilton, Alabama. This
facility manufactures tapered roller bearings and employs approximately
240 employees. The last contract expired April 21, 2006.
The parties opened negotiations on February 21st and met face-to-face
approximately twenty-one (21) times since the first meeting. At the first
meeting we exchanged non-economic proposals. The Company representatives
proposed approximately 235 non-economic changes. The Union proposed approximately
35 non-economic changes. The parties agreed to try to reach agreement
on all non-economic items prior to negotiating the economic items of the
contract.
On April 18th the Company presented the Union with an economics proposal.
The Union reminded the Company that we had an agreement that all non-economic
items would be resolved before discussing economic items. On April 22nd,
the Company presented the Union with what it claimed was their final economic
proposal. The Company called this proposal their “final” proposal
despite the fact that no negotiations had taken place on economic issues.
This economics proposal was presented to the Union late in the day, at
approximately 4:00 P.M. Again, the Union told the Company that the non-economic
items had not yet been resolved. Negotiations resumed again on May 8th.
On May 9th, the Union made an economic proposal to the Company. After
only meeting for a few minutes in face-to-face negotiations on May 10th,
the remainder of the meeting was conducted with the assistance of a Federal
Mediator.
The parties continued negotiations through the Federal Mediator through
Thursday of that week. On May 18th, the Company presented the Union with
their “last, best, and final offer”, through the Federal Mediator.
The Union requested a face-to-face meeting with the Company to continue
to conduct normal contract negotiations. The Company refused to meet with
the representatives of the Union. The Federal Mediator said that the Company
insisted that further negotiations would be held only through the Mediator.
The Company’s “best and final offer”, included several
items that had not been discussed by the parties and continued to include
provisions to allow the company to make changes to the Insurance and Pension
Plan documents without the Union’s agreement
Employees are currently working under the expired Agreement.
The Union has filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board regarding
a number of issues including information requested, but never received
from the Company, unilateral changes made by the Company, and removal
of work from the bargaining unit.
|
|